Please like and subscribe!
Part 1 of a 2-part AMA (Ask Me Anything) session with Author and Researcher Graham Hancock. I recorded this as part of several weeks travelling with Graham throughout Peru and Bolivia in 2013.
Timestamps for questions:
4:44: what is your history as an author?
15:46: are we looking at the work of aliens?
19:47: where are the oldest cities?
23:25: is there a lost civilization under the antarctic ice?
25:46: what are your thoughts on giants in history?
28:25: gaps in the fossil record and nuances of culture in the lost civilization
33:22: are secret societies withholding information?
34:59: how do you think life came to the planet?
40:33: What are your thoughts on Prophets?
41:48: what can you tell us about unexplored features of the Great Pyramid?
46:25: What do you think about the future of our own ‘western’ civilization?
48:33: thoughts on state surveillance and intrusion into everyday life
51:34: links between DMT patterns and McKenna’s ‘universal mind lattice’ concept
53:36: Widening our reference frame for viewing the past
1:00:13: Was telepathy involved in the lost civilization?
1:01:53: What happens at the moment of human death?
1:06:25: thoughts on resonance, and ‘singing stones’ into place
In Part 1 of this podcast we review the amazing megaliths of Yangshan Quarry in China, review the scientific, peer-reviewed evidence and work of the Comet Research Group looking into the Younger Dryas catacylsm, and debunk some of the fun stuff one can find on youtube.
In part 2 we visit Ollantaytambo Peru for a detailed site visit and discussion. Ben and Luke have visited the site several times.
Ollantaytambo is the gateway to Macchu Piccu, and an incredible megalithic site that shows clear examples of multiple construction techniques.
Located in the Sacred Valley (I (Ben) was wrong about the altitude – its just under 10K feet, down relative to Cusco) massive megalithic stones are perched precisely on top of a mountain, having been transported from a quarry in an adjacent mountain range.
These stones are surrounded by inferior, local stonework that, while clearly trying to replicate, repair and rebuild the megalithic work, aren’t in the same league from a technological or architectural perspective.
Orthodox histories are confused, there are several and conflicting accounts of this place. Most will say that not only did the Inca built it, it was built in the lifetime of one ruler, Pachacútec.
None of these accounts hold up to a basic open-minded investigation of the site. It seems much more likely that the Inca inherited a destroyed megalithic site, found it as sacred as we do, and used it – a tradition in this amazing place that has continued down to the present day inhabitants of Ollantaytambo.
Thanks to Patrick and to ‘Justaddwater’ for the links and photos they sent us in response to the last podcast. We’re always excited to find new stuff, and in this field answers always lead to more questions! Keep an eye out for our upcoming podcast on the enigmatic and less explored site of Abu Sir and Abu Gurob!
Are there unknowns about the Great Pyramid in Egypt? Lots of them! However, some of them are well known, but others are mysteries in plain sight, not known by most that pass through there.
Join us as we discuss using our new video podcast setup!
We also talk though some recent Younger Dryas news.
We’ve already had some great feedback and information that is shedding a bit more light onto these unknowns, check out the youtube comments.
Thanks for watching! Please like and subscribe, leave a comment or get us on http://pukajay.com for any feedback!
Subscribe to our channel for more content, or check it all out here at http://pukajay.com
follow us on twitter @pukajayprod
follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/pukajay
visit us on facebook at https://www.facebook.com/Pukajay5/
Pukajay Productions recently visited the Serapeum at Saqqara with Yousef Awyan from the Khemit School of Ancient Mysticism.
Check out the video on youtube and ensure you watch in HD!
Although not our first visit to the site, it continues to inspire awe and appreciation every time you enter the underground structure.
The Serapeum is a fascinating site. Located at Saqqara, Egypt, it’s a short drive from Giza through mazy Cairo streets and congested traffic.
The Serapeum is a unique underground complex of passages with recessed depressed alcoves, most of which house giant precision-carved boxes made from Syenite (with porphyritic diorite) or in some cases Rose (or Red) granite.
The site is officially dated to around 1300 BCE, during the reign of Khaemweset, (the son of Ramesses II) due to the style of the writing found on three of the boxes. (And a supposed further chamber never found again, more on that later). Egyptology maintains this site was hollowed out of the bedrock at that time, and used for symbolic burials of the Apis bulls. A later dynasty under Psamtik I then excavated and reused it.
There are some problems with this assessment, however.
Like other ancient sites around the world, we can see that there are multiple inheritances of the same site. The Greco-Roman style writings are likely from the Ptolemaic era, the era when it was rediscovered by Psamtik I.
This writing presents 98% of the case for the dating of the site,and of the 25 sarcophagi in the Serapeum, only 3 have writings. But, as you will see in the video and photographs, the writing on the boxes barely scratches the surface. It’s uneven, the lines aren’t straight, or parallel. Indeed, it’s some of the worst work you are likely to see.
This is very odd, since clearly with the unused shen rings in the box, it was being created to sell or trade to a high ranking individual. If you can carve the boxes out, with near perfect right angles, and you can polish the box to such an incredible finish still almost perfect thousands of years later, you can surely carve a few symbols clearly and cleanly into the exterior of the box? The evident lack of ability to carve hieroglyphs into the box is problematic.
The black boxes are made out of Syenite riddled with a porphyritic diorite conglomerate.
At 5.5 – 6.5 on the mohs scale of hardness, syenite is already much too hard for copper or even iron tools to be effective, but in this particular case the syenite is harder, due to the conglomerates within it (comprised of the porphyritic diorite). Iron will probably barely scratch the surface, indeed, it’s likely the chicken scratch ‘hieroglyphic graffiti’ was done using iron.
So this is a problem, how is it that you are removing that volume of stone from the interior of the boxes, including the near right angles etc? With iron or copper tools and pounding stones?
How are you excavating and positioning that weight in stone blocks?
How are you polishing such a difficult sub vitreous surface to such a long lasting high sheen? How are you keeping that polish consistent in the inside of the hollowed out crack or fracture lines?
These after all are the tools Egyptologists are stuck with, the copper (and later iron) chisels, the pounding stones, the rock and sand granule hand polishing.
Very often we see the early dynasties obsessed with using certain types of stone in very specific ways, often stone they are not supposed to have the ability to quarry, move or shape with the tools and level of craftsmanship attributed to them, and brought in from great distances. The Serapeum fits this modus operandi, in fact syenite takes its name from Syene, the Greek name for the ancient Egyptian city Swennet, which became Aswan, the location of the granite quarries some 900km distant from Cairo and the Serapeum.
The next issue we come across is the burrowing into the bedrock to create this site. It’s entirely underground, hollowed out rather than built, and the boxes moved into place along corridors that are so narrow in comparison, that in many cases there is less than six inches room on either side of the boxes. These boxes were then lowered into recessed alcoves, some of which again are barely wider than the boxes they house.
There is also evidence that the boxes were at least completed underground, if not entirely processed.
The smallest of these boxes weighs an estimated 50 tons. The largest is over 100 (with lid). How were ancient Egyptians maneuvering 100 ton boxes in the dark underground with no room on either side, and only room for 4 or 5 people across?
How the ancients were lighting the Serapeum is not clear either. There is no soot or flame residue on the ceilings, and fire would likely create oxygen problems, especially with the presumed amount of manpower necessary for the task of excavation and moving 50 – 100 ton boxes.
Some people have mentioned mirrors for reflection of light. First we must remember that until the 19th century there was no known method for blowing straight glass, so glass mirrors prior to that time were very small curved glass pieces that gave a distorted image. So they would have used polished metal mirrors. The reflective abilities of polished silver would likely struggle to light more than the closest area to the doors, let alone the depths of this complex.
Another problem is that the site is clearly being renovated, either by the dynasty supposedly building it or sometime during or after Psamtik I’s reign. This is not an uncommon discovery, the Sphinx also clearly has early dynastic repairs..at a time it was supposedly new. Here we find recycled floor tiles with hieroglyphs on, being used to redo the floors. But these renovations happen around the boxes, the floor under the boxes is left in its original state. Suddenly you realize: The renovators couldn’t move the boxes! They can’t write on the boxes, they can’t move the boxes..what is really going on here? Have later dynasties lost the abilities of earlier dynasties? Or is the history of these objects longer and more auspicious than we currently accept?
All the boxes except one were open when the Serapeum was found again. In 1850 Auguste Marriete found a sphinx’s head sticking out of the sand, excavated it and followed the path to the Serapeum. He excavated most of the current site and dynamited his way into the remaining box. Inside he reportedly found the mummified remains of an Apis bull. (If you look in the Agriculture museum you see the non-mummified remains of three bulls presented as what he found). His excavation notes were subsequently ‘lost’.
Another way the site is dated (via connection to Khaemweset, Ramesses II’s son), is by the account of Mariette’s discovery and identification of three sarcophagi in a chamber that was supposedly ‘too dangerous to excavate’. This chamber was never found again, or examined by anyone else.
Since all the boxes save one were open, Egyptologists consider the site as robbed, or looted. Considering the tight spaces,and the fact that in 1850 with much available manpower they were reliant on dynamite to get into the box, who it was supposedly looted by and how is an interesting question to consider.
We would struggle today to remove the larger boxes down there. Short of excavating the site through the bedrock ceilings and craning them out, it seems an almost impossible task.
Lastly, the polish on the boxes. As mentioned earlier, and as we discover in the video, Yousef Awyan first noticed a liquid residue on the underside of protruding lid edges. On closer examination, this liquid trail seems to leave a polished surface behind it when it runs across an unfinished surface, such as the underside of the lid. This is seen in several different instances. The writings are done after the polish, and the interior spaces of the writings, sometimes quite large, are not polished.You also see this in the Cairo museum on statues and boxes with similarly poor dating techniques used. After a while you start to wonder: were the dynastic Egyptians creating these pieces, or just writing on them?
***In modern times, Egypt commissioned the “Egypt Rising” statue and sent it to Italy to achieve a high quality polish. Less than 100 years later, the statue is already losing its finish. Compare this to ancient Egyptian works, many sitting in the sun for thousands of years that still have an amazing finish…..
Yousef and the Khemit School can be found here: http://www.khemitology.com/
~Luke, December 2016
Join us on our two-part series exploring the architecture and writings of the recently re-opened WNAS pyramid at Saqqara in Egypt. Commonly and incorrectly known also as the ‘Unas’ pyramid, this famous site has been closed for 28 years.
WNAS is famous because it differs from many of the other pyramids in that it’s interior walls have been plastered over and are entirely covered in hieroglyphs – making up the WNAS pyramid texts. These writings have been incredibly well preserved. As usual, Egyptology uses these writings to date and relate the structure, although it is entirely possible that the plaster and writings were added at some later date after the initial construction.
The structure also contains a massive basalt box with clear evidence of ancient high technology in it’s construction. The box is contemporary with the pyramid as it is too large to remove (or insert) via any of the passageways – meaning that it must have been brought inside during construction. It has no writings on it at all, which, given the evidence in the Egpytian museum (that contains many boxes that have been written on, although in crude fashion compared to the boxes themselves) adds to the possibility that the architecture was in place long before the walls were plastered over.
Indeed, this box’s large size in relation to the passageways is likely the only reason why this box is still in location and has not been plundered away to some collection or museum somewhere.
We were some of the first visitors to make it inside WNAS and we have captured the experience in 4K to share with everyone. Please enjoy, like and share!
Part 1: outside WNAS pyramid: (go to youtube and watch in HD or 4K!)
Part 2: inside WNAS pyramid – also in 4K